There is a recognised danger that where the steel frame is coated with a wet applied intumescent paint, the bolt and nut protection will not easily be validated. Furthermore there is also a danger that the bolt and nut surfaces may not be prepared in accordance with specific standards compromising the adhesion of the fire protection to the suface of the nut and bolts.
BackgroundIt has additionally been demonstrated that theoretical failure of the bolts can take place at lower temperatures than the structural elements they are connecting, questioning the viability of providing equivalent protection to that on the beams and columns (studies and fire tests carried out by The Steel Construction Institute). Evidence shows that breakdown occurs through heat shock of the high tensile material which can result in premature failure of the connection. Ongoing research involving fire engineers, material technologists, manufacturers and applicators into a method of applying an enhanced level of protection to the bolts, whilst seeking to keep within the tight cost constraints typical in the onstruction market place has led to the fire bolt cap solution. During independent testing to BS and UL standards, the Bolt cap has demonstrated it can provide sufficient external protection to ensure the bolts remain within their limiting temperature for a period of 120minutes, addressing the growing need in multi-storey construction to meet the increasing degree of performance demanded for Eurocode structural fire engineering. |
|
These images show the difference between a wet coated system and a bolt cap protected system after a fire. |
If it's not on, it's not protected! |
![]() |




